Science-led Accountability - Our FOI work

---

Annotating FOIs (Freedom of Information requests/responses) is important primarily in the context of public platforms like WhatDoTheyKnow (a popular UK site for making and viewing FOI requests), where users can add public notes or comments to individual requests.

Here are the key reasons why annotation matters:

• Helps people quickly understand the real value in a response — Official FOI replies are often long, technical, bureaucratic, or full of redactions. Annotations allow someone to add a plain-English summary of the actually useful or interesting information buried in the documents. This saves time for future readers who might otherwise have to wade through hundreds of pages.
• Provides context, explanations, and pointers — You can explain why certain parts are significant, link to related requests or external resources, clarify jargon, or highlight follow-up actions. This turns a raw FOI thread into something more actionable and educational.
• Discusses refusals and next steps constructively — When an authority refuses information (e.g. citing exemptions), annotations can explain the refusal reason in clearer terms, suggest whether an internal review or appeal to the Information Commissioner is worthwhile, or point to similar successful cases.
• Builds collective knowledge and improves transparency — Annotations create a shared, crowdsourced layer of analysis over thousands of FOI threads. This makes the whole system more useful for journalists, researchers, activists, and ordinary citizens trying to hold public bodies accountable.

The platform's own policy states that annotations exist specifically

"to help people get the information they want, or to give them pointers to places they can go to help them act on it."

Without annotations, many FOI responses would remain opaque or under-used even after release. Good annotations amplify the democratic value of freedom-of-information laws by making the released information far more accessible and impactful.